Plan A Impact Framework

Five dimensions. Audit-grade by design.

The Plan A Impact Framework is the methodology behind every Keystone engagement — owned 50/50 by SENIC and Diesis, validated annually by RAISE Alliance university partners, ESRS-aligned and IRIS+ compatible. Below is a public summary of how it works.

Why a framework was needed

Ad-hoc impact reporting doesn't survive due diligence.

The problem the framework solves.

Most impact reporting is bespoke. Each organisation invents its own indicators, picks its own evidence threshold, and reports against itself year on year. That's fine for storytelling — and useless when a foundation, bank or CSRD-bound corporate needs to compare a portfolio of 30 organisations against the same yardstick.

The Plan A Impact Framework standardises the questions, the maturity scale, and the peer-benchmark dataset. It still respects the diversity of mission-driven work — sector overlays handle that — but the structural readiness layer is identical across every engagement.

What we don't do

The framework refuses three common shortcuts.
  • We don't score self-reported aspiration. Only observable structure and behaviour.
  • We don't bundle measurement with capital deployment. The methodology stays defensible only if we have no upside in the score.
  • We don't keep the rubric private. The framework is published; sub-indicators are documented; peer review is on the public record.
The five pillars

Five questions every funder, buyer or board ends up asking.

Each pillar carries 30+ sub-indicators in the full Diagnostic. The Snapshot tests a deliberate sample of ten across four (Delivery and Governance combined for speed).

01Strategy

Where you're going.

Direction, coherence and resilience of the strategic plan.

Not every mission-led organisation has a written strategy. Of those that do, most haven't tested it against a downside scenario. The Strategy pillar measures clarity of direction, the diversification of revenue, the seniority of governance, and the discipline of scenario thinking.

Sample sub-indicators
  • Theory of change articulation
  • Revenue diversification & stability
  • 3-year board-approved plan
  • Scenario modelling discipline
  • Strategic-review cadence
02Impact

What you've changed.

Measurement maturity and external defensibility of impact claims.

The most common gap, especially in Segment A. Many organisations track outputs (people served, hours delivered) but not outcomes (behaviour change) or impact (system-level change). The Impact pillar measures the maturity of the measurement framework, the data systems, the cadence, and the level of external validation.

Sample sub-indicators
  • Outputs vs outcomes vs impact split
  • Data systems & cadence
  • ESRS / IRIS+ alignment
  • External validation level
  • Public reporting quality
03Funding

Whether you're investable.

Financial-model maturity and fund-readiness materials.

Capital flows where it can be assessed. The Funding pillar measures the sophistication of the financial model, the existence of fund-readiness materials (deck, data room, narrative), and the depth of the warm-pipeline relationships. It's the pillar most directly improved by the Sprint product.

Sample sub-indicators
  • Multi-year financial model
  • Scenario sensitivities
  • Investor or funder deck
  • Live data room
  • Pipeline & warm relationships
04Delivery

Whether you can scale.

Capacity, processes and resilience to grow without breaking.

Funders and buyers screen for delivery risk before they screen for product. The Delivery pillar measures team and succession resilience, documented operating playbooks, the level of key-person risk, and the genuine capacity headroom available to take on more.

Sample sub-indicators
  • Team & succession plan
  • Documented playbooks
  • Key-person risk
  • Capacity headroom
  • Process maturity
05Governance

Whether you're trustworthy.

Board strength, accountability and conflict-of-interest hygiene.

The least visible pillar from the outside, often the most decisive in the room. Governance measures the composition and skill mix of the board, the meeting cadence and quality of minutes, the presence of independent oversight, and the disclosure standards the organisation holds itself to.

Sample sub-indicators
  • Board composition & skill mix
  • Meeting cadence & minutes
  • Independent oversight
  • Disclosure & transparency
  • Conflict-of-interest policy
How we score

A 0–3 maturity scale, anchored to behaviour.

The scale.

Every indicator in the framework is scored on the same 0–3 maturity scale. The level descriptions are concrete — they describe an observable state, not a self-report. Two assessors should produce the same score from the same evidence.

0
Early

The capability does not yet exist or is informal.

1
Building

The capability exists but is inconsistent or partial.

2
Operating

Documented, in regular use, broadly trusted by stakeholders.

3
Mature

Externally validated, audit-ready, embedded in governance.

A pillar score is the average of its indicators expressed on a 0–100 scale. The overall Keystone Readiness Score is the equally-weighted average of the five pillar scores. The Snapshot reports four pillars (Delivery + Governance combined) for speed; the full Diagnostic reports all five separately.

Independent governance

Peer-reviewed, on the public record, every year.

RAISE Alliance peer review.

The Plan A Impact Framework is reviewed annually by RAISE Alliance university partners. The review covers methodology updates, the anonymised benchmark dataset, and any sector overlays added in the previous twelve months. The peer-review minutes are published alongside the annual benchmark report.

50/50 IP custody

The framework is owned 50/50 by SENIC and Diesis under the co-brand agreement. Neither party can unilaterally modify or licence it.

Anonymised benchmark dataset

Every consented engagement contributes anonymised indicator data to the benchmark. The dataset is curated by SENIC and audited by RAISE.

Methodology version log

Each framework version is dated and notarised. Clients are scored against the version current at engagement start.

See your score on the framework — in 5 minutes.

The Readiness Snapshot is a free, ten-question taste of the methodology. You'll get a personalised radar chart, peer percentile, and a recommended next step. Then walk the full pathway in the journey.

Monthly brief from Keystone.

EU funding intelligence, regulation watch, and benchmark briefings. Once a month. No drip campaigns.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy notice. Unsubscribe in one click.